Sunday, October 11, 2009
Blog #5
After reading the article, "Green Schools Don't make the Grade", by Todd Myers, I had to shake my head in disbelief. Why is it that the minute we as a nation try to implement something positive as creating a greener school we are already testing it after only a year to see if it's working and if it's not we already hang the idea out to dry. I believe a greener school will benefit us all; however tweeking is needed. Large windows might not be the answer to saving costs in heating and cooling systems; however other things can be beneficial. For example, in my school we have an energy saving light system that is sensory activated. This means if your in a room the lights are on, moreover, if there is no movement in a room for a period of time the lights will go off. Also, if children use the bathroom, there is a light timer so the lights will turn off after awhile. We also have recycling bins in the classroom for paper. I believe this has helped us be energy efficient and is teaching the children that conserving energy is important. It might cost more to implement these new systems, but the benefit we will all reap in the future will prove itself!
I believe that the effects of becoming green in the long run will benefit us greatly and teach children how and why they need to be green. We must look at the benefits in the future and start measuring what is working and what still needs to be done.
Good always prevails and Green is a good thing.
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Blog #4
In creating a Multicultural curriculum, author Adam Waxler discusses the importance of having multiculturalism curriculum without having to teach the exclusiveness of every culture. The more complicated teaching multiculturalism get , the more children will be wasting time not learning curriculum and creating nationalistic individuals. In my class, I have found promoting both help neither one become more important than the other.
In moving towards a centrist curriculum, the debate is whether curriculum should be moving towards promoting individuality when it comes to ethnicity or a centrist curriculum that promotes multiculturalism as a whole not as individualized ethnicities.
I say no, to both extremes, why not a world and individualized view, which would balance out any of the extremes in a classroom. Children need to come to an understanding of others ethnicity, as well as understanding that all races are special and important and not above another's.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Blog#3
In Pithissippi Burning, the author comments on Pith and his readers who believe in a white America, free of Multiculturalism. My reaction to this article was yes, there are people who feel this way, but whether they like it or not Multiculturalism is here stay and no one can ignore it. Perhaps, it has gone to the other extreme, where one cannot say the wrong word to describe a race or you will be sued. One needs to understand the past, to see why multicultural groups feel so passionate about being misrepresented or misnamed. In one sense,I cannot blame them. When you have been mistreated, disrespected and even murdered for your race, religion or color you will have a strong opinion about what is said about you. However, multiculturalism can go too far, when one is so nationalistic about their race that they discriminate others.
Last year, when I was teaching Kindergarten ELL, I noticed how a few of my children from Hispanic descent treated my children from African descent. A few didn't want to play with the child from African decent and would not treat them nicely. One child told me that their parents didn't like African Americans. I jumped in and taught a whole lesson on how we are all special and wonderfully made. I made it my priority to show those special few, how I felt about my African American children. I believe ignorance breeds ignorance and the truth about race can change those who will accept change. Some adults, never change and die with negative views about race, others become whole as they open themselves to change.
In " Why Multicultural is Wrong", the author discusses how multiculturalism is wrong and oppressive to immigrants. I don't agree. Multiculturalism is not perfect, and as I stated before. It can and has gone extreme at times, with nationalistic pride towards ones own country, where one separates themselves from others and discriminates other groups that don't believe, act or do as they do. However, I believe multiculturalism is positive, and helps people learn from one another, appreciate differences and unify us all. It is all based on ones perspective.
In "The Challenge of Multiculturalism", the author's discusses views that are contrary to that in, "Why is Multicultural wrong". The author discusses America leaving behind it's single mindedness and becoming a nation that is open to culture. I believe in teaching and celebrating cultural differences as well as discussing what really happened in history, and learning from the past so that what is negative in our history doesn't happen again.
Blog#2
Blog #2 What is Standard English?
Standard English as defined by Anita Barry is “the form of English that is recognized as the English of the educated, irrespective of region, gender, or ethnicity.” According to Norduquist, “ Standard English there is no single standard of English. Standard English is a dialect. “ I believe Standard English is a living and active dialect that is constantly changing, as we change in our societies. As we evolve, Standard English evolves.
What is Grammar? Descriptive? Prescriptive?
Grammar according to Kenneth Beave, “helps us understand what makes sentences and paragraphs clear, interesting and precise.” I believe grammar is necessary. We need a common standard of English that we can measure ourselves against in some way. When I first thought of Standard English I viewed it as correct way to speak English. However, in comparison to Norduquist, grammar is evolving so therefore, there is no single standard English or grammar. Language and the mechanics are constantly changing.
What is the Value of Studying Grammar?
Understanding and being able to converse both descriptively and prescriptively will aid adults and children in being able to speak in both formal and informal situations.
Which English is Best?
There isn’t a Best English. English changes ; Standard English helps children to know how to speak appropriately, yet it is important for them to know how to use informal and formal language.
Teaching Grammar in an ESL Classroom
Grammar can be taught in a Kindergarten classroom, but must be meaningfully connected. I believe that children need to understand how a language is formed
and how to speak the language appropriately. This will help the child to effectively speak the language.
Principled Eclecticism
According to Leonardo, Principled eclecticism refers to “the use of various teaching styles in a discriminating manner as required by learner needs and styles.” I believe that learners do learn as well as behave differently and require different teaching styles. I have learned many ways to teach the same lessons to reach different students.
Teaching grammar plays a central role in every ESL/ELL teacher's classroom. Without grammar children will never really master a language. How do I teach grammar is by incorporating grammar in my everyday lessons; such as teaching them to use describing words in their sentences or the reasons we capitalize the first letter of a sentence. I’m glad we have grammar ; however teaching grammar, teachers can use the principled Electicism, which is learning how teach in different ways. The more ways we know how to teach lessons to reach children the more effective we will be as teachers.
http://www.profleo.com/english
Barry, Anita (2002) English Grammar. New Jersey, Prentice Hall